Having invis that isn't detected by wards but by heroes is pretty cool. We see that in Dota via the Smoke item. It allows some interesting dynamics. I never got why they did this whole invisibility rework then decided to basically make invis even worse to play against than before.
[Patch 8.10] Jungle Changes v∞. Scuttle King. - Page 2
Forum Index > LoL General |
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
Having invis that isn't detected by wards but by heroes is pretty cool. We see that in Dota via the Smoke item. It allows some interesting dynamics. I never got why they did this whole invisibility rework then decided to basically make invis even worse to play against than before. | ||
Ansibled
United Kingdom9872 Posts
hype hype hype | ||
DarkCore
Germany4194 Posts
I never got why they did this whole invisibility rework then decided to basically make invis even worse to play against than before. Lots of stealth champions are pretty strong soloQ champions, even in KR Challenger, like Rengar/Eve. But Kha blows them out of the water, and I'm pretty sure it's because of his stupidly powerful ult/passive. Stealth is highly desirable, it's like being invulnerable but your opponent has even less outplay potential. Can't count the number of times I've legit thought 'I know Kha is somewhere on this half of the map, let me place a ward... Oh I'm dead before I was even in range to put down the ward'. Not to mention that being invisible to wards means that placing them in brushes is almost a bad idea, because the time you see him on the minimap is incredibly small, very easy to miss him popping up on the screen. | ||
739
Bearded Elder29875 Posts
Better 2v2v1 lanes ! | ||
General_Winter
United States719 Posts
Taric is the first champ that comes to mind, but maybe even someone like Annie or Cass could work. If they didn’t run out of mana they could maybe have solid clear speeds. Edit: now I feel dumb. It was pointed out to me that the powerful champion with a great kit, low cool downs and high mana costs who might make it in the jungle is probably Camille. | ||
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
I just clear my whole jungle and go about my business and ignore the whole crab politics like I usually do works out fine I mean if it's that important pick a crab and get one of them | ||
dsyxelic
United States1417 Posts
On May 16 2018 13:02 iCanada wrote: I think they want duo top lane back. LOL. Its even funnier because I usually run Jungle+Fill, and in my 290 ranked games this season I've played 2 games not as jungle... so clearly jungle is the least popular role as it was. I fill most of my games and I feel pretty comfortable saying the least popular role is toplane. I get placed top the vast majority, then followed by either jg or support. Those 2 have been fairly even in terms of filling. Sometimes I just choose a role because 'fill' just became 'top'. | ||
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
NpG)Explosive
France994 Posts
| ||
Gahlo
United States34965 Posts
| ||
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
Yorbon
Netherlands4272 Posts
| ||
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
dsyxelic
United States1417 Posts
| ||
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
@above, I'm not convinced it's that OP either but people just seem to be willing to fight to the death for it, and if one of them is your teammate it can be game losing not to help them it feels like. | ||
cLutZ
United States19551 Posts
| ||
eagle
United States693 Posts
| ||
DarkCore
Germany4194 Posts
| ||
Gahlo
United States34965 Posts
But what I'm really excited about is... + Show Spoiler [What] + + Show Spoiler [are] + + Show Spoiler [those?!] + | ||
M2
Bulgaria4076 Posts
On May 18 2018 19:48 Gahlo wrote: The ARAM changes make me cream my pants. Though the DH and Warmogs changes are temporary for the Bilgewater event, iirc. But what I'm really excited about is... + Show Spoiler [What] + + Show Spoiler [are] + + Show Spoiler [those?!] + i am a bit skeptical on the spear thing, fighters like fiora, jax, kled do fairly well atm imo and making them kind of unkillable for several seconds may prove too much of strength, but we shall see | ||
| ||