Riot didn't even let me buy Mystery Boxes because I own too many champs haha. Wish I could spend my blue essence on something, it's just piling up these days.
It’s so overturned that lichbane on a character with built in empowered autos is a noob trap. Why buy an item that requires you to auto when ludens splash can put you over the 100-0 threshold much safer.
Imo it's the extra CD that makes the item good on her, makes her abilities even more spammable.
On December 03 2017 06:59 DarkCore wrote: Riot didn't even let me buy Mystery Boxes because I own too many champs haha. Wish I could spend my blue essence on something, it's just piling up these days.
It’s so overturned that lichbane on a character with built in empowered autos is a noob trap. Why buy an item that requires you to auto when ludens splash can put you over the 100-0 threshold much safer.
Imo it's the extra CD that makes the item good on her, makes her abilities even more spammable.
When the BE store came out they made the mistake and didn't have that restriction. I bought 24 of them.
On December 03 2017 06:59 DarkCore wrote: Riot didn't even let me buy Mystery Boxes because I own too many champs haha. Wish I could spend my blue essence on something, it's just piling up these days.
It’s so overturned that lichbane on a character with built in empowered autos is a noob trap. Why buy an item that requires you to auto when ludens splash can put you over the 100-0 threshold much safer.
Imo it's the extra CD that makes the item good on her, makes her abilities even more spammable.
Isn't Morello much more efficient? It's cheaper, have more AP, more CDR and more mana.
I don't consider myself an expert, it was just an opinion. Most of my experience with Zoe has been having to deal with her past the laning phase, when she either blows me up as an ADC, or is impossible to lockdown as a top laner.
On December 04 2017 01:21 DarkCore wrote: I don't consider myself an expert, it was just an opinion. Most of my experience with Zoe has been having to deal with her past the laning phase, when she either blows me up as an ADC, or is impossible to lockdown as a top laner.
Why is she impossible to lock down? She has zero mobility. In my experience Zoes just get destroyed later on but I'm at weak shit elo so doubt that's good experience..
On December 04 2017 01:21 DarkCore wrote: I don't consider myself an expert, it was just an opinion. Most of my experience with Zoe has been having to deal with her past the laning phase, when she either blows me up as an ADC, or is impossible to lockdown as a top laner.
I dont really find her hard to lockdown, but then again I only play brainless toplaners like Ornn, Maokai or Nautilus.
On December 04 2017 01:21 DarkCore wrote: I don't consider myself an expert, it was just an opinion. Most of my experience with Zoe has been having to deal with her past the laning phase, when she either blows me up as an ADC, or is impossible to lockdown as a top laner.
Why is she impossible to lock down? She has zero mobility. In my experience Zoes just get destroyed later on but I'm at weak shit elo so doubt that's good experience..
The games I've played (which is few ~80% ban rate lol) she's been super hit or miss. I think she's sort of like Yasuo/Riven/Zed either the player is extremely good at the champion or just plain out suck and only play her because she's fun. At the moment it feels pretty hard to get a good feel of how strong she actually is thanks to the Yasuo-syndrome and how wonky she feels to play against.
On December 04 2017 01:21 DarkCore wrote: I don't consider myself an expert, it was just an opinion. Most of my experience with Zoe has been having to deal with her past the laning phase, when she either blows me up as an ADC, or is impossible to lockdown as a top laner.
Why is she impossible to lock down? She has zero mobility. In my experience Zoes just get destroyed later on but I'm at weak shit elo so doubt that's good experience..
Because her ult is short enough CD that she can play way back, and if you dive her she just tosses e at her feet and uses her w with its ridiculous speed boost to kite.
On December 04 2017 01:21 DarkCore wrote: I don't consider myself an expert, it was just an opinion. Most of my experience with Zoe has been having to deal with her past the laning phase, when she either blows me up as an ADC, or is impossible to lockdown as a top laner.
Why is she impossible to lock down? She has zero mobility. In my experience Zoes just get destroyed later on but I'm at weak shit elo so doubt that's good experience..
Because her ult is short enough CD that she can play way back, and if you dive her she just tosses e at her feet and uses her w with its ridiculous speed boost to kite.
On December 04 2017 01:21 DarkCore wrote: I don't consider myself an expert, it was just an opinion. Most of my experience with Zoe has been having to deal with her past the laning phase, when she either blows me up as an ADC, or is impossible to lockdown as a top laner.
Why is she impossible to lock down? She has zero mobility. In my experience Zoes just get destroyed later on but I'm at weak shit elo so doubt that's good experience..
Because her ult is short enough CD that she can play way back, and if you dive her she just tosses e at her feet and uses her w with its ridiculous speed boost to kite.
I remember when people here criticized me for criticizing the shyvana nerf heavily.
Champ is barely relevant, as I already predicted electrocute assassins own the jungle with minor aftershock play. The balance team is clueless, the faster you accept that the better.
I'm super confused why you say she's barely relevant when she's the most relevant she's been in quite some time? Fairly high play and winrate in Solo Q. Even saw some play in Kespa cup.
You are getting such a small sample size as well. Like some of those people are playing their pocket picks regardless of what is the "best" option. But I mean shyv even after the nerf is still on that list at any rate, and doing better here.
Their balance team has been out to lunch before but this seems like a poor example of that.
So I know most website like op.gg in addition to including raw winrates for champs include win rate for people with a bucnhbofngames, 40+ 50+ etc. but at least for op.gg although they show you per champion you can't see or sort all champions by win rates on experienced players. Anyone know a website that shows that?
On December 06 2017 01:16 General_Winter wrote: So I know most website like op.gg in addition to including raw winrates for champs include win rate for people with a bucnhbofngames, 40+ 50+ etc. but at least for op.gg although they show you per champion you can't see or sort all champions by win rates on experienced players. Anyone know a website that shows that?
On December 06 2017 01:16 General_Winter wrote: So I know most website like op.gg in addition to including raw winrates for champs include win rate for people with a bucnhbofngames, 40+ 50+ etc. but at least for op.gg although they show you per champion you can't see or sort all champions by win rates on experienced players. Anyone know a website that shows that?
On December 06 2017 01:16 General_Winter wrote: So I know most website like op.gg in addition to including raw winrates for champs include win rate for people with a bucnhbofngames, 40+ 50+ etc. but at least for op.gg although they show you per champion you can't see or sort all champions by win rates on experienced players. Anyone know a website that shows that?